TCA Aircraft Testing Department. Jet/ turboprop/ large prop aircraft test report: Date of Report: October 25, 1998 Tested by: Philip M. Wafer TCA #2302 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION A: (Original FSFS aircraft details.) a) Aircraft name: b) Aircraft registration: c) Aircraft Filename: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION B: (FS98 only aircraft file details.) a) Aircraft name: Dassault Falcon 50EX b) Aircraft registration: PJ-NBB c) File name: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION C: (Criteria Tested) 1) Endurance (range)NM: 3000nm 2) Take-off distance(metres): 1100m Landing distance(metres): 900m 3) Rotation speed (Vr)(KIAS): a) Educated guess: 130 kias b) Calculated: 117 kias 4) Climb: Best climb speed (KIAS/fpm):3500fpm at sea level 5) Overspeed clacker sounds at(at cruise altitude)Mach number or KIAS: M 0.87 6) Behavior under AP(OK/Not OK). a) Speed AP. OK b) Altitude AP. OK c) Heading AP. OK d) NAV1 AP. OK e) Back course AP. OK f) Approach AP. OK g) Autoland N/A 7) Speed @ 80% N1, FL310 (Mach number or KIAS). M 0.80 8) % N1 at recommended economic cruise speed: 91% = M 0.82 @ FL310 9) Stall speed (KIAS). a) 100% fuel: 98 clean, 90 dirty. b) 30% fuel: 93 clean, 85 dirty 10) Approach speed at 30% fuel(KIAS): 120 kias 11) Turns AP ON - (OK/Not OK): a) Level turns. OK b) Climbing turns. OK c) Descending turns. OK 12) Turns AP OFF - (OK/Not OK): a) Level turns. OK b) Climbing turns. OK c) Descending turns. OK 13) Landing speed(KIAS): a) 30% fuel: 120 kias b) 15% fuel: 118 kias 14) Take-off with some engines out of service: Did take-off run with centre engine o/o/s. 1700m, but ok. Rate of climb - about 1000fpm. Did take off run with one outer engine o/o/s. 2100m, difficult to keep in a straight line. Large aileron input required to compensate when airborne. Rate of climb - about 1000fpm. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION D: NOTES/COMMENTS: 1) Visual model is nice except that the a/c appears to stand a foot above the ground when not in the air. 2) This a/c appears to need trim-up for take off. 3) On approach, beware when reducing thrust to idle at the threshold as the a/c tends to pitch up significantly! 4) 2) & 3) are possibly due to the fact that the engines are situated 5 & 6 feet ABOVE the horizontal plane of the CoG.